Monday, April 23, 2012

Managing a Difficult Employee

Dear Debbie,

I manage a great work group except for one employee who is a chronic complainer and persistently negative. I tried once to counsel him as part of his performance review, and he badmouthed me to the rest of the group. What should my next step be?


This falls into the 80/20, or better yet, the 90/10 rule wherein 10 percent of your employees actually create 90 percent of your problems. This one employee, if left to his own devices, could potentially destroy your team’s morale and undermine your credibility in the process. Such dissent can also hinder your workgroup’s performance. There’s a lot at stake in this situation.
As the manager of the group, the sole responsibility for taking action rests with you. You basically have two choices: rein him in (have the employee change their ways), or move him out (either voluntarily or involuntarily).
With any employee issue, you want to identify whether the problem is performance related or behavior related. Once you determine which it is, your course of action will be much easier to define. In this case, the problem is clearly a behavioral issue which should always be dealt with in a swift and decisive manner. I say this because behavioral issues are conscious decisions on the part of the employee to behave in a certain way which is typically unacceptable to the organizational rules and values. A performance related issue, on the other hand, would be addressed very differently.
Your employee has chosen to be negative and to chronically complain. Even worse, he has chosen to behave in a way that is bordering insubordination by “badmouthing” you as his manager. The result of this behavior is damaging to the workgroup and to the company, which is unacceptable.
You mention that you have counseled him as a part of his performance review. Have you had a standalone discussion with him about only his behavior? Have you presented him with very specific examples of how his behavior is unacceptable and why it is a negative force for the entire group? If you have not yet had this specific discussion, then you should do so immediately. Be sure to document your discussion in detail. When you have this talk with him, you should include specific expectations that define exactly what you will and will not tolerate in his behavior going forward. Additionally, you should outline the next steps that will occur, such as a follow up meeting to gauge his performance and progress, and include the expected changes that you will be reviewing with him at that time. This puts the responsibility squarely on him to really think about and take steps to change his behavior.
I cannot stress enough the need for you to cite very specific examples of his negative behavior and how you would expect him to handle similar situations differently in the future. The hope is that you will be able to turn him around and see a marked improvement in him once you bring it to his attention and let him know the consequences.
Be aware that there will be times when an employee simply refuses to change. Either the person does not believe that there will be consequences or they are resistant to change at all costs. In this case, continue to document any ensuing meetings and your efforts to counsel him. If all else fails and you are seeing no improvement, then it may be time to terminate his employment. Allowing one person to adversely affect your entire workgroup simply isn’t fair to your employees, to you, or to your company.
Good luck – this is one of the particularly challenging parts of being a leader.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Join in the conversation by commenting on the posts - thanks!